Four members of the U.S. House from Western Pennsylvania -- three Republicans and a Democrat -- on Monday helped defeat a $700 billion emergency rescue proposal for the nation's financial system.
They called the Emergency Stabilization Act of 2008 a flawed bill that would "leave taxpayers holding the bag."
Two Democrats who voted for the measure said failure to take action could put the national economy in peril of a "deep recession."
"I can tell you it is the first vote I've ever taken and had a queasy feeling in my stomach," said Rep. Bill Shuster, a Republican from Hollidaysburg who opposed the bill. "I do believe we need to act. I do not believe this was the right legislation to move forward on. This was a very difficult vote."
Others voting no included Reps. Jason Altmire, D-McCandless; Phil English, R-Erie; and Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair.
Democratic Reps. Mike Doyle of Forest Hills and John Murtha of Johnstown supported the bill.
"I wasn't prepared to put people I represent at risk -- their pension funds, their ability to get student loans and car loans," Doyle said. "It seemed to me that doing nothing wasn't an option."
The House defeated the bill by a 228-205 vote, despite warnings from the White House and congressional leaders of both parties that failure to act could result in a nosedive on Wall Street. Stocks plummeted 777 points yesterday.
Opponents said they couldn't back the measure as it was written.
Murphy decried the legislation as a proposal that "represented a breathtaking expansion of federal government power, paid for with taxpayer funds."
"Incredibly, this proposal prohibited any congressional or judicial review," Murphy said.
English said the bill's "flaws and unchecked risk to the taxpayer, in my view, outweighed any potential benefits."
"It has been my strong belief that any rescue proposal necessarily include real consequences for bad actors, strong taxpayer protections and accountability and transparency of any tax dollars used," English said.
Altmire said hundreds of his constituents contacted him who "are overwhelmingly opposed to the bailout plan."
"They wonder why Washington is so quick to act to help those on Wall Street, yet nothing is done to help them," Altmire said. "The times ahead are going to require tough decisions -- but we should not start by asking American families and small businesses to pay for the mistakes of Wall Street."
Murtha said he voted for the bill after consulting with "numerous financial and economic experts."
"I came to the conclusion that we simply cannot ignore this crisis, and that Congress has to pass legislation that will free up our credit markets while at the same time protecting the U.S. taxpayers," Murtha said.
Doyle said the House could take up a revised version of the bill later this week or early next week.
"I'm willing to look at a different way to do it," Doyle said. "What I'm not willing to do is do nothing and stand by and watch the economy go into a recession."